Sean Hannity Speaks For Gays

December 4, 2008 at 12:00 pm | In 1 | 3 Comments

Sean Hannity, pretty-boy “journalist” on the Fixed Fox “News” channel, has become a spokesgirl for the gay community!

Although I never watch the FNC, I found myself flipping the channels last night and heard a promo for a discussion about some anti-Mormon ad in California regarding their church funneling money to promote Prop 8 in California. So, I’m watching this dreck segment and suddenly Hannity pipes up and says this: ”What gays have been after all this time, and I think they’ve actually gotten it is….” -he flips his hands up into the air- “…tolerance!”

Tolerance.

tol⋅er⋅ate

[tol-uh-reyt]

–verb (used with object), -at⋅ed, -at⋅ing.

1.	to allow the existence, presence, practice, or act of without prohibition or hindrance; permit.

2.	to endure without repugnance; put up with: I can tolerate laziness, but not incompetence.

3.	Medicine/Medical. to endure or resist the action of (a drug, poison, etc.).

4.	Obsolete. to experience, undergo, or sustain, as pain or hardship.

So, that’s it kids. According to Hannity, we wanted it and we’ve gotten it. To be “tolerated”

I don’t know about you…I don’t recall that being a priority of mine. I believe I’m already allowed to exist. Of course, in some societies past and present, gay people are not allowed to exist, indeed they are killed for being gay. But at least here in America, no one is hindering my right to simply be.

Take a look at the rest of the definitions. See if any of that is what you have been seeking, if you are LGBT and reading this.

Hmmm…I don’t know, Sean. Maybe you should NEVER SPEAK TO WHAT GAY PEOPLE ARE AFTER EVER AGAIN! At least not until you can get it right. Screw your “tolerance” I don’t care to be tolerated by you. I, actually, can speak to what gay people “want”, for the most part, I believe. We want our basic civil rights, motherfucker. Like the regular tax-paying, citizen folk we are. It’s real simple. You stupid dumbass. photo is from Stewwebb.com

3 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

That person of which you speak is not worth time or energy. I do agree that you should speak your mind as you have (good job too) and then go on to focus on what you want as you have. It is necessary to look at what we don’t want, in order to know and focus on what we do want. Having said that I now prefer to focus on a world where that person of which you speak becomes a voice that is ignored more and more.
Hug to you!

Comment by Shawn — December 4, 2008 #

Reply
Freud asked the similar question
‘What do women want?”

The answer is easy – equality.

Comment by urspo — December 5, 2008 #

Reply
WELL SAID woof!!!! I hate this ignorant spokesman for Mr. Murdoch. And the picture is great.

Comment by Mark H — December 9, 2008 #

Reply